Sunday, August 29, 2021

Bleeding Fool

Bleeding Fool


Same Day Streaming Releases Made Movie Piracy Explode

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 04:45 PM PDT

 

The days of bringing a camcorder into the movie theater to bootleg new films are long gone. With the tremendous transformation in how modern movies are distributed to consumers, there’s also been a massive advancement in movie bootlegging a.k.a. piracy. And now, with studios focusing more on streaming rather than theaters, there’s been an increase in high-quality, pirated online versions of new movies, according to the Wall Street Journal.

 

In fact, the majority of new films may currently be accessed on piracy websites such as The Pirate Bay and LimeTorrents, or watched online on sites like Putlocker.

 

According to the WSJ, “Black Widow” was the most pirated movie in the world for three weeks after its release. And according to their research, many of the year’s biggest films went from official release to downloaded bootleg “nearly immediately.” After “Black Widow’s” disappointing opening weekend performance in theaters, despite excellent Thursday night advance screenings, theater owners and studios suspected that piracy had a part.

 

 

Scarlett Johansson and her team even ended up suing Disney+ over concerns about releasing “Black Widow” on its streaming service while movie was still in cinemas. The action was filed after Johansson’s pay discussions fell through when she expressed worries about piracy. And the National Association of Theatre Owners said in a follow up statement after the release: "How much money did everyone lose to simultaneous release piracy?"

 

Related: Theater Owners Furious with Disney as 'Black Widow' Collapses

 

The availability of high-quality pirated versions of movies has been aided by the digital delivery of films via streaming rather than only in cinemas. While studios have done a good job of using streaming to supplement theatrical releases during the epidemic, the continuous growth of piracy is posing a rising danger to studios and streaming providers.

 

When the Wall Street Journal checked in on a random Tuesday in August of this year, they discovered that 12 of the top 20 most pirated videos on The Pirate Bay had opened on studio streaming services rather than exclusively in cinemas. "We started to see a significant rise when lockdowns started," said Andy Chatterley of piracy tracker Muso. "The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It", one of 2021’s major releases, grossed $201.4 million in theaters but was also, according to Muso, the most pirated movie in the world in June.

 

It reportedly topped 9.2 million illegal streams. 

 

 

Illegal streams have also put a damper on new sign-ups for the streaming services:

When Disney released "Jungle Cruise," starring Dwayne Johnson and Emily Blunt, on Disney+, a community of tens of thousands of people were both "seeding"—meaning sharing an illegal copy—and "leeching"—downloading the film free—within less than a day of its release, according to piracy tracking sites. Disney, which charged Disney+ users an extra $30 to watch the movie on the platform, said it grossed $30 million from subscribers on the film's opening weekend.

 

According to the Wall Street Journal, IMAX and other theater chains are making deals with the studios to mitigate the impact of piracy.

 

Rich Gelfond, chief executive of theater chain IMAX Corp. , says an increase in pirating and declining revenues could have a lasting impact on Hollywood. "It will limit how great content is made and distributed," he said.

While it isn't known exactly how much piracy has shaped studios' decisions, some are revisiting online release strategies crafted in the past year.

Earlier this month, AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc., AMC 1.31% the nation's biggest theater chain, said it had struck a deal with Warner Bros. for next year, guaranteeing the studio's films would enjoy 45 days of theatrical exclusivity before moving online. The agreement backtracked on an existing simultaneous-release strategy.

Disney has said it would continue to release films both online and in theaters, deciding the details on a film-by-film basis. Its next Marvel film, "Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings" will be in theaters only.

 

Related: Could Piracy Save Cinemas and Slow Hollywood's Streaming Growth?

 

When will these studios learn that if they stop making it so easy to get a pristine digital copy online, then consumers will eventually pay for the content?

The post Same Day Streaming Releases Made Movie Piracy Explode appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

‘Diversity Day’ Episode of ‘The Office’ Removed at Comedy Central

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 02:30 PM PDT

The hit comedy series The Office's "Diversity Day" episode was recently omitted from a Sunday marathon screening of the long-running mockumentary series Comedy Central. The episode, which satirized contemporary corporate "diversity and inclusion" initiatives, appears to be the latest casualty of an increasingly censorious #woke society. The censorship was noted by Barstool Sports at the time.

 

 

“…instead of just slapping up a trigger warning for an episode of “The Office”, Comedy Central quietly omitted it from the rotation thus sending OCD-riddled completists into delirium and prompting me blog about it, drawing even more attention to this, dare I say, canceling of a modern day icon. Fret not as this doesn’t mean that you can only watch ‘Diversity Day’ on some shady site that gives your PC cybercrabs; you just need to pony up to enjoy it on Peacock or buy it for $3 from any number of streaming outlets. It also means that Comedy Central doesn’t get the first part of its name.”

 

 

The episode features the series’ principal character, Michael Scott (played by Steve Carell), impersonating a Chris Rock comic piece regarding black people’s attitudes of other black people. He later does a parody of an Indian accent.  "Diversity Day" is possibly one of the series’ most exceptional episodes, using Carrell’s character to make casual stereotypes and bigotry look ugly. The audience applauds Kelly when she eventually decks him.

 

YouTube Video

 

Steve Carell hinted in 2018 that the production of The Office at the time would “be impossible” owing to today’s political considerations. 

 

“It might be impossible to do that show today and have people accept it the way it was accepted ten years ago. The climate's different. I mean, the whole idea of that character, Michael Scott, so much of it was predicated on inappropriate behavior. I mean, he's certainly not a model boss. A lot of what is depicted on that show is completely wrong-minded. That's the point, you know? But I just don't know how that would fly now. There's a very high awareness of offensive things today—which is good, for sure. But at the same time, when you take a character like that too literally, it doesn't really work.”

 

As Carrell puts it, the point is “wrong-mindedness.” Is the risk of offending individuals greater than the reward of making a point about racism’s wrongness? Jokes based on mocking intolerance aren’t usually accurate. Comedy is a highly personal experience. However, it is intended to be offensive. It must be offensive.

 

 

Comedy Central did not comment on why they decided to pull the episode when the Federalist or Barstool Sports made inquiries. Maybe we should call them Cowardly Central from now on?

 

Thankfully are still a few remaining other places where we can still watch the episode.

The post 'Diversity Day' Episode of 'The Office' Removed at Comedy Central appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

Is the GI Joe Franchise Dead? What Could this Mean for Star Trek?

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 12:15 PM PDT

 

It’s been a few weeks since the 3rd GI Joe-related movie, Snake Eyes, tanked at the box office, but here’s a Forbes article discussing the failure, and what it means for further Star Trek movies in consideration by Paramount, along with any plans for more superhero movies:

 

There are a million reasons why this happened. Offhand, audiences didn't want another badly-reviewed G.I. Joe movie. Audiences didn't want a reboot that was a prequel for "the movie you wanted to see," etc. The expected crash for the "Snake Eyes before he was Snake Eyes" flick serves as a cautionary tale for whatever Paramount has in the works for Star Trek. It's been five years since the lackluster performance of Justin Lin's (mainly well-liked) Star Trek Beyond, which earned $158 million domestic and $338 million worldwide against a $185 million budget. That means we've been getting five years' worth of "Star Trek 4 is going to happen!" news blasts.

It started days before Star Trek Beyond, with word that Paramount was developing a sequel involving time travel and the post-death return of Chris Hemsworth as Kirk's late father. As I noted then, it was a bluff, a preemptive show of false strength to make the upcoming film's commercial performance seem more promising than it turned out to be. It's not unlike when Warner Bros. reacted to the horrific 69% second-weekend drop of Green Lantern (which would eventually earn just $220 million on a $200 million budget) by (allegedly) announcing a sequel. Ten years later, and there's no Green Lantern 2. We'll see if Cruella 2 or Wonder Woman 3, both announced as a show of perceived success, actually get made.

 

Which reminds me again that since the 2013 Man of Steel movie, no solo film for Superman was made, and now, if there is going to be one, it turns out the unbearable Ta-Nehisi Coates is developing the screenplay, leading to worries it’ll embody all the worst PC traits you could think of.

 

A Star Trek movie with the rollercoaster spirit of a Star Wars movie instantly became less special once Disney bought Star Wars in 2012 and began making sequels to Return of the Jedi. Furthermore, the "only in Star Trek" elements (a high-energy blockbuster that's part workplace melodrama, part surrogate family dramedy and all action-packed FX spectacular) became readily available in the 2010's-era Fast & Furious movies and Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy. By 2016, Star Trek Beyond, like Independence Day Resurgence, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Into the Shadows, Jason Bourne and Ghostbusterswere arbitrary "attempted tentpole of the week" extensions of once-were-special brands and franchises. And even at the start, Star Trek and G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra only flew so high.

 

One could assess from the above that famous franchises that came under corporate control became less special as they were subject to double the commercialization, and double the dumbing-down. I vaguely remember the first GI Joe movie’s biggest insult was that the Pit base was set in Egypt (and one character even wore an Islamic keffiyeh!). And this was after false rumors were spread that it would be set in Brussels. Nor did it help that the film was released without press screenings.

 

 

And now, who knew, the failure of this particular movie is bound to affect other franchises by extension, if only because they’re already faltering as it is, not the least being Star Trek, which has suffered from PC just as much over the past decade (IIRC, the J.J. Abrams reboot made Capt. Kirk otherwise unsuccessful with women). The UK Independent reported 2 years ago that a 4th installment was canceled, and this news isn’t brightening the horizon for more. So, could this additionally suggest a 3rd Wonder Woman movie might not be in the cards?

 

Since we’re on the subject, this also reminded me of a review I found from critic Dennis Schwartz that I thought would be best to take issue with, even if the negativity is justified:

 

This is the third film in the G.I. Joe franchise. It's an elaborate origin film that turns out to be a boring action figure toy film joylessly directed by Robert Schwentke ("The Divergent Series: Insurgent"/"The Captain"). It's based on a story by Evan Spiliotopoulos that he co-writes with Anna Waterhouse and Joe Shrapnel. The bloodless attack sequences are a turn off, as is the plastic performance by the star Harry Golding. It plays out as a conventional action pic that's a blend of ninja mythology with urban crime thriller.

 

Look, it may be dreadful, but I don’t think “bloodless” should be a reason why. And that’s because surrealism itself isn’t a bad thing. It’s just a matter of how entertaining the finished product is that matters. Judging from the audience reception as much as the critics, it clearly failed in that regard. I wish some critics wouldn’t make it sound like bloodletting is such a big deal, because that’s only dumbing down entertainment ever more. If the A-Team had been like that back in the 80s, it wouldn’t have flown well.

 

 

I will say that, if there’s anything going for the Snake Eyes film, it would have to be the outfit design worn by Samara Weaving as Scarlett. That’s actually rather good. But again, if the box office receipts say anything, it’d have to be about the best thing you could say about a botch job where Snake Eyes doesn’t wear a mask for much of the movie, just so everybody can see he’s played by a guy of Asian background, in what was a deliberate example of casting for PC’s sake (which Forbes didn’t dwell on, sadly, as could only be expected from such a mainstream news site). It’s a terrible shame that once again, a franchise like GI Joe’s been done a disfavor by PC advocates, much as was done to the 2 earlier films, resulting in a movie tentpole project that never really got off the ground.

 

Originally published here.

The post Is the GI Joe Franchise Dead? What Could this Mean for Star Trek? appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

Sly Stallone Says ‘Rocky IV’ Director’s Cut is Finally Complete

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 10:13 AM PDT

 

Last year, while in lockdowns, Sylvester Stallone announced that he was working on a new edit of his 1985 hit film, Rocky IV, which he describes as the definitive directors cut of the film. Since that announcement, Stallone has been constantly keeping fans updated on his progress on the project, and with the film’s November release date approaching, his most recent update contained not only a bit about the film but also a very rare photo of himself and co-star Dolph Lundgren. Rocky IV, written, directed, and starring Stallone as the title character for the fourth time, was released in 1985. And while it still reigns supreme as the most profitable of the Rocky franchise and was arguably well received by many fans, the sequel generally panned by critics, perhaps leading to Stallone’s wish to recut the film. 

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Sly Stallone (@officialslystallone)

 

Rocky IV, written and directed by Sylvester Stallone, was released in theaters in 1985. It follows the narrative of boxing legend Rocky Balboa, with Stallone reprising his role as the title character. Dolph Lundgren also appears as Ivan Drago, a formidable Russian fighter against whom Rocky competes. In addition to Stallone and Lundgren, the film stars Carl Weathers, Talia Shire, Burt Young, and Brigitte Nielsen. The events of the film were addressed in the sequel Creed II, which followed Apollo Creed’s son, Donny, as he feuds with Drago’s son, Viktor.

 

YouTube Video

 

Rocky fights Ivan Drago (Lundgren) in the film after Drago fights and kills Rocky’s best buddy and previous opponent Apollo Creed. Rocky faces Drago in the Soviet Union to avenge Creed’s death while also defending his country’s pride. The new version of the film will be named Rocky Vs Drago: The Ultimate Director’s Cut, and it will be accompanied by a full-length documentary called Keep Punching: The Present Meets The Past, which will explain a behind-the-scenes look at how the Director’s Cut was made. Stallone was previously quoted on documentary film as saying,

“If you can go back to recut your film, I guarantee you you would approach it with a sensitivity and a wisdom, and a confidence, ‘oh, why didn’t I see that before?’ All of us are entitled to follow our dreams, to stick to our beliefs, because in the end that’s all you have and if you keep believing in that eventually your dreams will come true.”

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Sly Stallone (@officialslystallone)

 

This could be the final time we see fresh footage of Stallone as Balboa, as the actor has stated that he will not be reprising his role as the “Italian Stallion” in Creed III after appearing in the first two films. Nonetheless, Stallone has expressed a desire to create a prequel series featuring young Rocky in the years preceding the first film.

 

 

The director’s cut will include previously unseen footage, such as a new fight scene between Rocky Balboa (Stallone) and Ivan Drago (Dolph Lundgren). Another significant difference is that Paulie’s pet robot Sico will not appear in the film since Stallone did not believe the moment matched with what he had in mind for the sequel. The machine had all his scenes cut from the film.  I sure hope they didn’t cut James Brown’s musical scene.

 

Rocky Vs Drago: The Ultimate Director’s Cut will be released on November 11.

The post Sly Stallone Says ‘Rocky IV’ Director’s Cut is Finally Complete appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

Marvel’s Werewolf by Night May Hit Disney+ for Halloween

Posted: 28 Aug 2021 05:25 AM PDT

 

Werewolf by Night” is one of Marvel’s most famous horror characters. As of late, the character has become more relevant to the wider Marvel universe. Now Inside the Magic reports that Marvel Studios is seeking a Latino actor to cast as the lead in an upcoming live-action Halloween special for Disney+. While details are scarce at the moment, the rumor is that the stand-alone Marvel Halloween special would be based on the werewolf character from the pages of Marvel Comics: Werewolf by Night.

 

 

Marvel Studios has now aired three live-action series based in the MCU on Disney+ and is currently in mid-season with the MCU's first animated anthology. Critics and fans alike have been full-throated supporters of Marvel's ambitious streaming series projects, WandaVision — which featured a Halloween episode with Wanda (Elizabeth Olsen) and Vision (Paul Bettany) in costumes — The Falcon and The Winter SoldierLoki, and What If…?. With several more new series in various stages of production for Marvel's Phase 4, plus possible (and confirmed) second seasons on the way, Marvel has enjoyed the storytelling power that the widely popular Disney+ streaming service has afforded the studio — particularly during the unprecedented times of a global pandemic.

 

Marvel Studios has begun a search for a Latino male, 30s, to front the planned spooky season spectacular, said to begin shooting early in 2022. Based on the description of the role, it seems likely the project will be a live-action presentation. Marvel is reportedly actively searching for a lead, and speculation is rampant that recent rumblings about a Werewolf by Night project landing at Disney+ are congruent with the yet unnamed Halloween project.

The post Marvel’s Werewolf by Night May Hit Disney+ for Halloween appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

No comments:

Post a Comment

guest post needed

Hi I hope you're doing well. I'm reaching out to discuss the possibility of publishing articles on your website. Along with guest ...