Friday, December 3, 2021

Bleeding Fool

Bleeding Fool

Helen Mirren May Have Accidentally Spoiled ‘Shazam! Fury of the Gods’

Posted: 03 Dec 2021 10:55 AM PST

 

Fans got their first look at Shazam! Fury of the Gods last month when a behind-the-scenes sizzle reel for the film debuted during the DC FanDome virtual convention. That footage provided an epic look at the film’s scope, but also raised some questions in the process — including the roles of some of the film’s new cast members.

 

Among them is West Side Story‘s Rachel Zegler, who appears to be playing a classmate and potential love interest of Freddy Freeman (Jack Dylan Grazer). New comments from fellow cast member Helen Mirren, however, could hint at a larger significance to Zegler’s role, with the actress accidentally letting it slip in an interview with The Associated Press that Zegler is one of “three goddesses” alongside herself and Lucy Liu.

 

“I’m not going to tell you the answer to that,” Mirren explained. “You’re going to have to ascertain for yourself. I’m a member of three goddesses: Lucy Liu as Kalypso and the third goddess played by Rachel Zegler, who will be a huge star in a very short space of time. So there are three of us together, and that was really a great experience because it’s so infrequent that you get to spend a whole of a movie with two other women. So often you’re the only woman in the cast. Here we were a trio, and that was great. I loved it.”

 

This matches with rumors that had swirled around Fury of the Gods in 2020, with casting descriptions hinting at a trio of “sisters” of varying ages being the film’s villains. Among them was a role looking for an actress to play a seventeen-year-old in the film, which Zegler (who is currently twenty) fits the bill of.

 

Shazam! Fury of the Gods is set to be released on June 2, 2023.

 

via ComicBook.com

The post Helen Mirren May Have Accidentally Spoiled ‘Shazam! Fury of the Gods’ appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

Jason Reitman Has Villain Ready for Sequel to Ghostbusters: Afterlife

Posted: 03 Dec 2021 07:55 AM PST

 

If Sony decides to do a sequel to Ghostbusters: Afterlife, director Jason Reitman knows exactly who the villain should be. Reitman said on the Happy Sad Confused podcast: “There is a lot of time and opportunity for Vigo the Carpathian to make his return. Look, are you saying that’s the only painting of Vigo the Carpathian? Maybe, he’s riding a horse in another one, maybe, impaling someone in another one.”

 

 

The original Vigo was played by the late Wilhelm von Homburg and voiced by the late Max von Sydow with the character basically coming to life from a self-portrait at the Manhattan Museum of Art and he possess the museum curator, played by Peter MacNicol, possible the best part of the sequel. Recently Reitman confirmed that Ghostbusters II was canon to the franchise and that there were subtle Easter Eggs to it in Afterlife including Ray working at Ray's Occult and the toast from the 1989 film being I the farmhouse.

 

The ending of the latest film does its best to set up a sequel and the box office numbers have been decent with a strong audience score… so I think seeing more of the new Ghostbusters is a good possibility.  

The post Jason Reitman Has Villain Ready for Sequel to Ghostbusters: Afterlife appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

Book Riot’s Schizophrenic Argument Regarding Jewish Comic Characters

Posted: 03 Dec 2021 06:20 AM PST

 

Here’s a writer at leftist Book Riot talking about Jewish characters from a historical perspective, telling what a shame it is when they’re obscured, which is true, and then damaging the whole argument with the mere mention of Marvel’s worst propaganda vehicle of recent, the Muslim Ms. Marvel. First, if there’s something this at least gets right, and also points to something troubling:

 

DC marketed Whistle as the first new Jewish superhero from them in 40 years. First of all, if that were true, it would be an embarrassing self-own. But it's not true. Harley Quinn was introduced on Batman: The Animated Series in 1992, and folded into the main DC universe in 1999. Kate Kane was reintroduced as Batwoman in 2006. And Al Rothstein, who has gone by Nuklon and Atom-Smasher, debuted in 1983, squeaking in just under that 40 year cutoff.

I sort of get why Harley and Kate might be excluded from that stat. After all, Harley's usually somewhere on the villain to antihero scale rather than a pure hero. And Kate was technically a revamp of a much older character, Kathy Kane, who first appeared in 1956 — the 2006 version was significantly revamped to be Jewish, a lesbian, and Bruce Wayne's cousin.

But it feels like splitting hairs to me to exclude them from the category of "recent Jewish heroes." It feels especially icky when taking into account how high profile they both are: Harley has starred in three movies and her own TV show (the latter of has been called out for its use of anti-Semitic tropes), and Kate starred in the first season of Batwoman before the departure of the actress playing her, Ruby Rose, led to casting Javicia Leslie as a new, non-Jewish Batwoman. These are characters that hundreds of thousands of people who've never picked up a comic book know the names of; why is their Jewishness suddenly being rules-lawyered out?

And there's no reason to exclude Al Rothstein from that list at all, so why does he disappear from the promotional statistic? When he's played by Noah Centineo in next year's Black Adam and goes from obscure C-lister to movie star, will his Jewishness be further downplayed or erased?

 

 

Yes, it’s true, Nuklon (I’d rather NOT call him by that Atom-Smasher codename, as it merely alludes to a time where DC was already falling into terrible pretensions at the turn of the century) came much earlier, and he was co-created by Roy and Dann Thomas in All-Star Squadron, and soon prominently featured in the more modern-set spinoff, Infinity Inc. But considering the political correctness Whistle reeks of, is it any wonder DC would obscure Nuklon? Hardly. (So it’ll be no shock if Jewishness doesn’t factor into an upcoming movie.) As for the new Batwoman, given she was one of DC’s earlier social justice pandering creations (by the dreadful Greg Rucka), what’s the point of citing her, since DC went downhill a long time ago?

 

See Also Jerusalem Post Focuses on Batwoman's Faith, Ignores Identity Politics

Interesting they complain here that the Harley Quinn series contains anti-Semitic tropes, though I have reason to wonder if it’s not stemming from altruism. The columnist wonders why the Jewishness of certain characters is being thrown out? Obviously, it could prove antisemitism is still a serious issue in corporate-owned entertainment (just look at what Mark Ruffalo’s spewed out), but she doesn’t seem up to admitting the likelihoods. That’s exactly why I’m wondering what’s so special about a villainess who’s practically been pushed to faux-stardom for the sake of it? And lest we forget, if HQ began as a criminal, not a superhero, then why run the gauntlet of making it sound like she’s worth citation? In which case, why even bother to cite such a grossly overused character, whose very use has long gone past the point of embarrassment? Which is just what this next paragraph is:

 

Presenting a hot new character of a given marginalized identity as the first ever or first in X amount of years is not a new thing. When Kamala Khan debuted as Ms. Marvel in 2014, she was proclaimed far and wide to be the first Muslim character in the Marvel universe and/or superhero comics, neither of which is true. Yes, she was and remains by far the highest profile Muslim character in superhero comics, but that's not the same as being the first, and this pattern of overemphasizing scarcity merely serves to whitewash (and straightwash, Christianwash, etc.) comics more than they've already done themselves. Kamala's Muslim predecessors may have been obscure and often stereotypically presented, but that didn't mean they weren't important to Muslim readers.

 

If she’d take a more realist view, she’d realize they’re not important to most Muslim readers she assumes are actually reading these items…save for propaganda purposes. She sure doesn’t seem interested in story merit, that’s for sure, or maybe she’d consider that not only is much of the recent mainstream output so dreadful, but surely it’s not insulting how a villainess is being pushed as a sex symbol? I find that disturbing, as is the part implying heterosexuality and Christianity are literally bad things. It’s bad enough Superman’s franchise is being humiliated, and these leftist columnists are practically the reason why.

 

Similarly, it was important to me to see Al Rothstein speaking Yiddish on the page, years before Whistle came along. It was important to see Harley celebrating Hanukkah, or Kate struggling with a very Jewish ambivalence about her faith. As much as I loved seeing Whistle talk about concepts like tikkun olam — and I truly, truly loved it — I can't help being frustrated that she seems to exist in a contrived vacuum. Harley's given a passing cameo, but Kate is absent. And notably, so is the most prominent Jewish character in the entirety of superhero comics: Bruce Wayne.

 

But it’s not important to have merit, is it? Again, that’s something pretty absent here. I find it disgusting she thinks the sight of HQ celebrating the Hanukkah holiday is a big deal, based on the character’s villainy. All that does is sour the holiday. Say, how come Superman doesn’t warrant notice here, based on Kal-El’s being co-created by 2 Jewish artists and writers who were about 18 when they debuted the Man of Steel? Just more signs the columnist really is that poor in her views.

 

That forgetting feels familiar to the way the Jewish history of comics is "rediscovered" with every new think piece. Jewish characters, like Jewish creators, seem to disappear most of the time, only to be trotted out when they can be presented as a rare or surprising spectacle. But Jewish identity is baked into the very essence of the superhero, and has been since the beginning. After more than 80 years of the genre, when it's grown from disposable entertainment for a dime to the biggest movies and TV shows in pop culture, I'm ready to see the Jewish heritage of the superhero acknowledged on a regular basis. It's long past time.

 

Trouble is, this article is so superficial and self-important, it doesn’t sound like the writer wants to see Israel presented as part of that heritage. She doesn’t ask for Armenians to get any kind of significant heroic role in comicdom, nor Macedonians, and it’s just so frustrating, I’d be a lot happier if people like her wouldn’t talk about the art form any more. Mainly because she won’t take an objective view of the medium, and how it’s been terribly dumbed down, with the movies now catching up to the political correctness they’ve suffered from.

 

Originally published here.

The post Book Riot’s Schizophrenic Argument Regarding Jewish Comic Characters appeared first on Bleeding Fool.

Benedict Cumberbatch Addresses those Doctor Strange 2 Reshoots

Posted: 03 Dec 2021 04:45 AM PST

 

 

There's been a lot of talk about the reshoots for Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and while a lot of people think this is a bad sign for the film, reshoots are a very normal part of the Marvel Studiosway of making movies. They plan on reshoots from the beginning to allow them to make the best film possible is what they say.

 

The Doctor Strange sequel had some extensive reshoots planed for November and December and we get a bit of clarity on that from star Benedict Cumberbatch from his conversation with Empire Magazine.  “We’re in the middle of reshoots and we’re working incredibly hard to make a schedule work to realize the full potential of the film — bits that we want to do better but also bits that were just impossible to do on the day because of logistics, COVID, etc. We were so delayed in production because of that. Luckily, not during production too much. Although everything is just a little slower.”

 

Now reports have been saying that there's a ton of new writing and shooting for the film, it kind of makes sense when you have something a connected as the MCU that you have to adjust on the fly to new ideas, what the other productions are doing and simple decisions to do a scene a different way when it doesn't quite work in post. It's unclear at this point whether the Multiverse of Madness in the title is a result of what happens in Spider-Man: No Way Home or if it will be a new problem more in line with the doctor himself and his continued research into the time stone.

 

Maybe it has something with Tom Holland’s contract extension?

 

via The Direct

The post Benedict Cumberbatch Addresses those Doctor Strange 2 Reshoots appeared first on Bleeding Fool.
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

guest post needed

Hi I hope you're doing well. I'm reaching out to discuss the possibility of publishing articles on your website. Along with guest ...